Publication
Horizon Scanning: Investigations and Enforcement
In this horizon scan, we focus on key developments affecting companies operating in the UK, including in light of the recent change in UK government.
Australia | Publication | June 2020
Major Queensland rail infrastructure has been re-declared this week, following a long-running process.
On 31 May 2020, the Queensland Treasurer, in his capacity as Minister administering the Queensland Competition Authority Act 1997 (Qld) (the Act), decided to declare:
The rail routes covered by the decision are critical monopoly infrastructure in Queensland used, in large part, to transport coal from pit to port. Access to the service on reasonable terms is therefore important to that industry and others. The above mentioned services are already declared but those declarations will expire on 8 September 2020.
On 4 April 2018, the Queensland Competition Authority (QCA) commenced the declaration review process by issuing notices of review and investigation in order to make a recommendation to the Minister whether or not to declare the whole or part of each service.
The QCA and the Minister each considered whether or not the declaration criteria set out in section 76(2) of the Act are satisfied. The declaration criteria for consideration are:
A service (or part of a service) can only be declared under the Act if all of the declaration criteria are satisfied.
The QCA sought submissions from stakeholders, and consulted extensively with the owners and users of the relevant facilities.
Declaration is significant. A facility subject to declaration must comply with the processes contained in the Act, including by providing access. QCA-approved access undertakings have historically determined with a high degree of specificity the terms of access for declared services in Queensland, including the terms of access and the prices that may be charged by infrastructure owners for use of the declared services.
The QCA recommended to the Minister that:
The Minister’s decision reflected the recommendations made by the QCA in respect of the CQCN and the Queensland Rail service. However, the Minister ultimately came to a different conclusion in respect of the coal handling service at DBCT.
The QCA determined that criteria (a) and (d) were not satisfied in respect of the coal handling service at DBCT. Although the QCA accepted that the owner of the service would have an incentive to exert market power, without declaration, a proposed deed poll and access framework provided by the owner of the service during the declaration review process would be sufficient to ensure that there was no discretion on the service provider to impose excessive access charges. Despite acknowledging that access seekers and new users of the service would expect to receive higher access charges and generally enjoy less favourable terms of access than existing users, the QCA was ultimately not satisfied that access as a result of declaration would promote a material increase in competition in a dependent market.
The Minister decided that criteria (a) and (d) were satisfied in respect of the coal handling service at DBCT. The Minister concluded that declaration was likely to result in the promotion of a material increase in competition in the market for development-stage coal tenements in the Hay Point catchment (being the catchment in which the majority of the mines which supply DBCT are located).
Unlike the QCA, the Minister found that the threat of declaration where declaration had been removed was unlikely to curb the exercise of market power by the service provider. Further, the Minister also determined that the voluntary access framework provided by the service provider was insufficient to support competitive outcomes. Specifically, the price differential for access between new users and existing users of the service was likely to materially impact the ability for those participants to compete on a level playing field. As such, the Minister found that declaration would result in a material promotion of competition in the market for development tenements in the Hay Point Catchment, and that such a promotion of competition would promote the public interest (satisfying both criterion (a) and criterion (d)).
The lengthy declarations for each of the services determined by the Minister should provide some certainty for resources companies as to the availability of access to the services.
Nonetheless, the outcome is provocative due to the varied approach to the declaration criteria taken by the QCA and the Minister. It is also the first time the declaration criteria have been tested in a Queensland context and under the Act. There is therefore a risk of applications to revoke the declaration or for judicial review being made by the service providers.
The only part of the Queensland Rail service which was not recommended for declaration by the QCA was the Tablelands system, which provides passenger-only above rail services. The QCA found, and the Minister ultimately accepted, that not all of the declaration criteria were satisfied.
Publication
In this horizon scan, we focus on key developments affecting companies operating in the UK, including in light of the recent change in UK government.
Publication
As you begin planning for the upcoming financial year, it is likely that legal operations projects are on your radar. However, securing the necessary budget can be challenging. Our roundtable on October 1, ‘Preparing for FY2025 - Building a compelling business case’, will help you create compelling business cases for your legal initiatives.
Publication
On 3 September 2024, the ECJ delivered its judgment in Illumina’s appeal against the General Court’s (GC) judgment confirming the European Commission’s (EC) powers to review concentrations under the EU Merger Regulation (EUMR) in circumstances where no Member State has jurisdiction under national law.
Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest legal news, information and events . . .
© Norton Rose Fulbright LLP 2023